Protocols for biological assessment

Summary

This information updates the recommendations of the biological monitoring protocols that were provided in Volume 2, Appendix 3 of the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines for fresh and marine water quality.

ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) contained nine groups of protocols (some of which were subdivided into separate methods) for biological indicators (see Appendix 3 of Vol. 2 of ANZECC/ARMCANZ 2000). Some of these protocols are now out of date or alternative procedures have been developed since the publication of ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000).

Instead of providing detailed protocols, this updated information advises users to seek the latest relevant methods and protocols for a chosen biological response indicator in the peer-reviewed, international, published literature and also as provided or advised by relevant national, state or territory governments. Note that handbooks (e.g. Hauer & Lamberti 1996, Gibson et al. 2000, Davies et al. 2001, CCME 2011, Anderson & Davis 2013) can quickly become dated and, like those in ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000), should be treated as starting points for a thorough search of the relevant literature. Simpson and Batley (2016) provided recent surveys of protocols for assessing sediment quality (see Section 1), and there will likely be developments and improvements of these protocols as research and implementation progress.

This information should be used in conjunction with ANZG (2020), which describes issues that guide the choice of biological response indicators (also termed ecosystem receptor indicators). Some of the links on this page are for particular programs or jurisdictionally specific processes. The onus is on the user to justify the selection of indicators so that they are fit for the project purposes based on the current understanding and management goals determined in Step 1 and Step 2 of the Water Quality Management Framework (ANZG 2018). For example, using a rapid biological assessment protocol may be inadequate to investigate an unexpected event. Conversely, such a protocol may be suitable for implementing a broad-scale monitoring program.

Protocols for biological assessment of sediments

Detailed protocols for the assessment of indicators of sediment quality are provided in Simpson and Batley (2016), which is downloadable from the CSIRO website. These comprise protocols for:

  • whole sediment bioassay using the marine microalga Entomoneis cf. punctulata
  • 10-day whole sediment sub-lethal (reproduction) and acute toxicity tests using the epibenthic amphipod Melita plumulosa
  • whole sediment sub-lethal (reproduction) and acute toxicity tests using the copepod Nitocra spinipes
  • 10-day whole sediment lethality tests and 30-day bioaccumulation tests using the deposit-feeding benthic bivalve Tellina deltoidalis
  • 10-day whole sediment sub-lethal (reproduction) and acute toxicity tests using the freshwater chironomid Chironomus tepperi
  • whole sediment acute and sub-lethal toxicity tests using the freshwater pond snail Physa acuta
  • whole sediment bivalve biomarker assays using Tellina deltoidalis and Anadara trapezia
  • ecotoxicogenomics: microarray analysis of gene expression in sediment biota.

Protocols for biological monitoring of waters

Various agencies provide guidance about sampling protocols for particular biological indicators and programs. Most of the links on this page refer to particular programs for a given government agency, and such programs may not cover all applications of biological response indicators. For the convenience of users, these links provide information about biological response indicators specific to each country, state, territory or major regional program at the time of writing. None of these sources will provide comprehensive information for all possible situations, and users should liaise with agencies and stakeholders to ensure the appropriate indicators are selected and the acceptable protocols are used.

Similarly, some industry-specific protocols may become available or be recommended under some circumstances. For example, appropriate indicators and sampling protocols for assessing impacts of salmonid farming on rocky reefs are discussed by Valentine et al. (2016), and Nichols et al. (2017) canvas options for improving rapid biological assessment protocols using freshwater macroinvertebrates.

Expand all

Acknowledgement

This update on protocols for biological assessment was compiled by Dr Ross Smith (Hydrobiology Pty Ltd) and Dr Leon Barmuta (University of Tasmania) and reviewed by Dr Chris Humphrey (Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment), Dr Graeme Batley (CSIRO) and Dr Rick van Dam (WQadvice).

Last modified: