Aluminium in freshwater and marine water
Toxicant default guideline values for protecting aquatic ecosystems
October 2000
Extracted from Section 8.3.7 ‘Detailed descriptions of chemicals’ of the ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines.
The default guideline values (previously known as ‘trigger values’) and associated information in this technical brief should be used in accordance with the detailed guidance provided in the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality.
Chemical description
Aluminium is the most abundant metallic element in the lithosphere, but has little or no known biological function (Gensemer & Playle 1999).
Summary of factors affecting aluminium toxicity
Toxicity to fish and invertebrates is increased at low (e.g. <5.5) and high pH (e.g. >9).
Toxicity reduced by complexing with fluoride, citrate and humic substances. The effect of organic complexation requires experimental determination.
Toxicity is reduced in presence of silicon.
Toxicity reduced at high water hardness (high calcium concentrations) but no algorithms are currently available.
Increased temperature may increase aluminium toxicity.
No data on salinity effects.
No data on effects of suspended particulate matter.
Toxicity of aluminium may be affected by presence of other metals.
The speciation of aluminium in water can be ascertained using a variety of methods including:
- Analytical techniques, such as physical separation (e.g. [ultra]filtration, dialysis, centrifugation), fluorimetry, potentiometry (e.g. ion-selective electrode), colorimetry, ligand competition, ion exchange and flow-injection (Bloom & Erich 1996, Hawke et al. 1996, Gensemer & Playle 1999, Pyrznska et al. 2000)
- Theoretical techniques, such as geochemical modelling (Browne & Driscoll 1993, Nordstrom & May 1996).
Bioassays are typically used to ascertain metal-organism interactions. These can be coupled with measured and/or predicted speciation calculations to determine the bioavailability of various aluminium species. The current analytical practical quantitation limit (PQL) for aluminium is 0.5 µg/L in both fresh and marine waters (NSW EPA 2000).
Factors affecting bioavailability and toxicity of aluminium
The bioavailability and toxicity of aluminium is generally greatest in acid solutions (Campbell & Stokes 1985). Aluminium in acid habitats has been observed to be toxic to fish (Dillon et al. 1984), amphibians (Andren et al. 1988) and phytoplankton (Folsom et al. 1986, Claesson & Tornqvist 1988). Aluminium is generally more toxic over the pH range 4.4 to 5.4, with a maximum toxicity occurring around pH 5.0 to 5.2 (Schofield & Trojnar 1980, Parent & Campbell 1994). The inorganic single unit aluminium species (A1(OH)2+) is thought to be the most toxic (Driscoll et al. 1980).
Under very acid conditions, the toxic effects of the high H+ concentration appear to be more important than the effects of low concentrations of aluminium; at approximately neutral pH values, the toxicity of aluminium is greatly reduced (CCREM 1987). The solubility of aluminium is also enhanced under alkaline conditions, due to its amphoteric character, and some researchers found that the acute toxicity of aluminium increased from pH 7 to pH 9 (Freeman & Evert 1971, Hunter et al. 1980). However, the opposite relationship was found in other studies (Boyd 1979). There are few studies on toxicity of aluminium in waters of pH >8 (Sparling & Lowe 1996).
Collier and Winterbourne (1987) studied acidic (pH 4.3 to 5.7) and more alkaline (pH 6.6 to 8.0) streams in New Zealand, and found higher numbers of invertebrate taxa (64 compared with 43) and greater mean densities of benthic invertebrates (up to five times higher) in alkaline streams. Although aluminium concentrations in acidic streams were elevated (total reactive aluminium of 123 to 363 µg/L compared with 84 µg/L in alkaline streams), they suggested that the depauperate fauna in those streams was due to changes in the food supply (e.g. epilithon), resulting from pH and not aluminium. However, most of the toxic species of aluminium were probably being complexed by dissolved humic matter in the acidic streams. Initial mixing zones where acidic, aluminium-rich water is neutralised are most toxic to fish (Gensemer & Playle 1999). Fish kills can occur naturally in northern Australia when acidic, Al-rich water is released into billabongs at the end of some dry seasons (Brown et al. 1983).
Poléo et al. (1991) observed an increase in toxicity of aluminium to Atlantic salmon with increasing temperature, which may be due to faster aluminium polymerisation at higher temperature, as well as higher metabolic rate of the fish. Temperature also affects aluminium speciation and solubility (Gensemer & Playle 1999).
The uptake and toxicity of aluminium in freshwater organisms generally decreases with increasing water hardness under acidic, neutral and alkaline conditions (Folsom et al. 1986, Playle et al. 1989, Reid & McDonald 1991, Gunderson et al. 1994). Hutchinson and Sprague (1987) found that the threshold toxicity of aluminium to flagfish Jordanella floridae (95 µg/L in soft water at pH 5.8) was reduced to 29 µg/L in the presence of zinc (5 µg/L) and copper (2 µg/L). Gensemer and Playle (1999) outline the complexity of mixture effects with aluminium.
Complexing agents such as fluoride, citrate and humic substances reduce the availability of aluminium to organisms, resulting in lower toxicity. Silicon can also reduce aluminium toxicity to fish (Gensemer & Playle 1999).
No studies have reported the effect of salinity on the uptake and toxicity of aluminium to estuarine and marine organisms. Further, no information on the bioavailability of aluminium sorbed to colloidal and particulate matter has been reported.
Toxicity and freshwater guidelines for aluminium
Gensemer and Playle (1999) provide a detailed summary of aluminium toxicity to various aquatic organisms. Among freshwater aquatic plants, single-celled plants are generally the most sensitive to aluminium (USEPA 1988a). Fish are generally more sensitive to aluminium than aquatic invertebrates (Gensemer & Playle 1999). Aluminium is a gill toxicant to fish, causing both ionoregulatory and respiratory effects (Gensemer & Playle 1999). Aluminium is more toxic in both acidic and alkaline water. Clark and LaZerte (1985) reported that hatching success of American toad Bufo americanus at pH 4.3 was significantly reduced with addition at 10 mg/L aluminium and the NOEC was 5 µg/L. CCREM (1987) considered that concentrations greater than 100 mg/L would be deleterious to aquatic life at pH >6.5.
Screened freshwater toxicity data for aluminium were separated into those conducted at pH >6.5 and those at pH <6.5. Acute and chronic toxicity data are outlined below but only acute data were used for calculations. Chronic toxicity figures comprised a mixture of LC/EC50, LOEC, MATC and NOEC figures; where stated, these were converted to NOEC equivalents using the method modified from van de Plassche et al. (1993) (ANZECC & ARMCANZ 2000 Section 8.3.4.4) (expressed mostly as geometric means for species). The pH range was 6.5 to 8.6.
Freshwater pH >6.5
Fish: Acute 48 to 96-hour LC50 five species: 600 (Salmo salar) — 106,000 mg/L; chronic seven species, 8 to 28-day converted NOEC, 34 to 7100 µg/L. The lowest measured chronic figure was an 8-day LC50 of 170 µg/L for Micropterus sp.
Amphibian: Acute Bufo americanus, 4-day LC50 860 to 1660 µg/L; chronic, 8-day LC50 of 2280 µg/L.
Crustaceans: one species 48-h LC50 2300 to 36,900 µg/L; chronic three species, 7 to 28-day NOEC, 136 to 1720 µg/L.
Algae: 96-h EC50 population growth, 460 to 570 µg/L; chronic two species, NOEC, 800 to 2000 µg/L.
Freshwater pH <6.5 (all between pH 4.5 and 6.0)
Fish: four species, 24–96h LC50 15 (S. trutta) — 4200 µg/L; chronic data on S. trutta, 21 to 42-day LC50, 15 to 105 µg/L.
Amphibians: two species, 4 to 5-day LC50 540 to 2670 µg/L (absolute range 400 to 5200 µg/L).
Alga: one species NOEC growth 2000 µg/L.
A freshwater moderate reliability trigger value of 55 µg/L was derived for aluminium at pH >6.5 using the statistical distribution method (Burr distribution as modified by CSIRO, ANZECC & ARMCANZ 2000 Section 8.3.3.3) with 95% protection and an ACR of 8.2. A freshwater low reliability trigger value of 0.8 µg/L was derived for aluminium at pH <6.5 using an assessment factor (AF) of 20 (essential element) on the low pH trout LC50 figure. The low reliability figures should only be used as indicative interim working levels.
Marine guidelines
A total of 11 acute data points were available for aluminium in seawater, comprising three taxonomic groups, as follows:
Crustaceans: four species, 72 to 96-hour LC50, 240 µg/L (Balanus eburneus) to 10,000 µg/L (Nitocra spinipes); a 7-day NOEC (mortality) for Cancer anthonyi of 1000 µg/L.
Mollusc: one species, 72-hour LC50, 2440 µg/L.
Annelid: two species, 96-hour LC50, 97 µg/L (Ctenodrilus serratus) to 405 µg/L (Capitella capitata).
There was an insufficient spread of data to calculate a reliable guideline trigger value for aluminium in seawater.
There were limited marine data and procedures for calculating an Environmental Concern Level (ECL) (ANZECC & ARMCANZ 2000 Section 8.3.4.5) were used to calculate a low reliability marine trigger value of 0.5 µg/L derived for aluminium using an AF of 200. This figure should only be used as an indicative interim working level but could be revisited as more data become available. The factor of 200 was used because the ECL factor of 1000 was considered excessive for such a commonly found element.
References
Andren C, Hendrikson L, Olsson M & Nilson G 1988. Effects of pH and aluminium on embryonic and early larval stages of Swedish brown frogs Rana arvalis, R. tempararia and R. dalmatina (Holland). Ecology 11, 127–135.
ANZECC & ARMCANZ 2000. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra.
Bloom PR & Erich MS 1996. The quantitation of aqueous aluminium. In The environmental chemistry of aluminium, ed G Sposito, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1–38.
Boyd CE 1979. Aluminium sulfate (alum) for precipitating clay turbidity from fish ponds. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 108, 307–313.
Brown TE, Morley AW, Sanderson NT & Tait RD 1983. Report of a large fish kill resulting from natural acid water conditions in Australia. Journal of Fish Biology 22, 335–350.
Browne BA & Driscoll CT 1993. pH-dependent binding of aluminium by a fulvic acid. Environmental Science and Technology 27, 915–922.
Campbell PGC & Stokes PM 1985. Acidification and toxicity of metals to aquatic biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42, 2034–2049.
CCREM 1987. Canadian water quality guidelines. Canadian Council of Resource and Environment Ministers, Ontario.
Claesson A & Tornqvist L 1988. The toxicity of aluminium to two acid tolerant green algae. Water Research 22, 977–983.
Clark KL & LaZerte DB 1985. A laboratory study on the effects of aluminium and pH on amphibian eggs and tadpoles. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42, 1544–1551.
Collier KJ & Winterbourn MJ 1987. Faunal and chemical dynamics of some acid and alkaline New Zealand streams. Freshwater Biology 18, 227–240.
Dillon PJ, Yan ND & Harvey HH 1984. Acid deposition: Effects on aquatic ecosystems. CRC Critical Reviews in Environmental Control 13, 167–194.
Driscoll CT, Baker JP, Bisogni JJ & Schofield CL 1980. Effects of aluminium speciation in dilute acidified waters. Nature 284, 161–164.
Folsom BR, Popescu NA & Wood JM 1986. Comparative study of aluminium and copper transport and toxicity in an acid-tolerant freshwater green alga. Environmental Science and Technology 20, 616–620.
Freeman RA & Evert WH 1971. Toxicity of aluminium hydroxide complexes in neutral and basic media to rainbow trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 100, 644–658.
Gensemer RW & Playle RC 1999. The bioavailability and toxicity of aluminium in aquatic environments. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 29, 315–450.
Gunderson DT, Bustaman S, Seim WK & Curtis LR 1994. pH, hardness, and humic acid influence aluminium toxicity to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in weakly alkaline waters. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51, 1345–1355.
Hawke DJ, Powell KJ & Gregor JE 1996. Determination of the aluminium complexing capacity of fulvic acids and natural waters, with examples from five New Zealand rivers. Marine and Freshwater Research 47, 11–17.
Hunter JB, Ross SL & Tannahil J 1980. Aluminium pollution and fish toxicity. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 79, 413–420.
Hutchinson NJ & Sprague JB 1987. Reduced lethality of Al, Zn, and Cu mixtures to American flagfish by complexation with humic substances in acidified soft waters. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 6, 755–765.
Nordstrom DK & May HM 1996. Aqueous equilibrium chemistry for mononuclear aluminium species. In The environmental chemistry of aluminium, ed G Sposito, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 39–80.
NSW EPA 2000. Analytical Chemistry Section, Table of Trigger Values 20 March 2000, LD33/11, Lidcombe, NSW.
Parent L & Campbell PGC 1994. Aluminium bioavailability to the green alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa in acidified synthetic soft water. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 13, 587–598.
Playle RC, Goss GG & Wood CM 1989. Physiological disturbances in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) during acid and aluminium exposures in soft water of two calcium concentrations. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67, 314–324.
Poléo ABS, Lydersen E & Muniz IP 1991. The influence of temperature on aqueous aluminium chemistry and survival of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fingerlings. Aquatic Toxicology 21, 267–278.
Pyrzynska K, Gucer S & Bulska E 2000. Flow-injection speciation of aluminium. Water Research 34, 359–365.
Reid SD & McDonald DG 1991. Metal binding activity of the gills of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48, 1061–1068.
Schofield CL & Trojnar JR 1980. Aluminium toxicity to brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in acidified waters. International Conference on Environmental Toxicity, May 21–32. 1979, Rochester. (Cited in ANZECC 1992.)
Sparling DW & Lowe TP 1996. Environmental hazards of aluminium to plants, invertebrates, fish, and wildlife. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 145, 1–127.
USEPA 1988a. Ambient water quality criteria for aluminium — 1988. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
van de Plassche EJ, Polder MD & Canton JH 1993. Derivation of maximum permissible concentrations for several volatile compounds for water and soil. National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Report 679101 008, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.