Pathway for toxicant default guideline value publication

Each new or revised toxicant DGV will be published as a draft for public comment for a period of 3 months as a part of our approval process. Until the approval process has been successfully completed, the draft DGV is only draft and should not be used or referred to as an Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality DGV.

Draft DGVs will continue to become available on this website.

If you want to know when the revised guidance has been published, please subscribe for updates.

Submit a response

Provide feedback on a draft DGV during its 3-month public comment period by sending us a completed Submission on the draft toxicant DGV.

Table 1 Toxicant draft DGVs for water and sediment — drafts for public comment

Table 2 Toxicant DGVs for water and sediment — status post public consultation phase

Development of draft DGVs involves 4 stages:

1. Approved for review process — proposed DGV approved for development and derivation has commenced
2. Submitted — proposed DGV developed, including supporting data and information, and submitted for review
3. Under consideration — proposed DGV under review, including independent peer review and finalisation based on peer review comments
4. Published as draft — open for public comment

Check what is being developed

A number of proposed DGVs have been derived and submitted for consideration to be included in the Water Quality Guidelines as DGVs. These are at different stages of the submission process and are listed in Table 3.

Table 3 Toxicant default guideline values being developed for water and sediment

Third-parties can propose DGVs for toxicants in water or sediment. These will need to be derived (using the approved method) and funded by third parties for publication on the Water Quality Guidelines website.

Third party proposed DGVs can be contributed by:

• governments (e.g. intergovernmental committees, state or territory governments, local governments)
• other proponents (e.g. regional or community groups, industry groups, businesses).

Benefits of contributions by third parties

• Give the public and water quality managers' access to more toxicant DGVs, sooner.
• Provide proponents with an opportunity to propose new toxicant DGVs that are of interest to them, and if accepted, will result in new toxicant DGVs being developed.
• Help governments to save costs through the development of additional toxicant DGVs.

Instructions for third-parties to contribute a proposed default guideline value

Before you propose a third-party DGV for publication on the Water Quality Guidelines website, please check:

1. current toxicant DGVs in fresh and marine water
2. current toxicant DGVs in sediment
3. toxicant DGVs for water and sediment — drafts for public comment (Table 1)
4. toxicant DGVs for water and sediment — status post public consultation phase (Table 2)
5. toxicant DGVs being developed for water and sediment (Table 3)
6. toxicant DGVs proposed by third parties (Table 4)

If the toxicant is not listed, then you may submit a request to develop a DGV for consideration. The derivation of DGVs for a specific toxicant should only be proposed if:

• there is an appropriate analytical method for measuring the specific toxicant (or surrogate chemical marker or metabolite) that is causing toxicity (as measured in toxicity studies), in the relevant medium (i.e. water or sediment); or
• if there is no such method, that the toxicant is known to be in use and it is reasonable to expect that it will be released to aquatic environments (in which case an analytical method would also need to be developed).

Information on availability of appropriate analytical methods can be sought from standard methods published by organisations such as USEPA, OECD or ASTM, or by consulting with a number of appropriately accredited commercial analytical laboratories, preferably in Australia or New Zealand. Additional guidance on requirements for analytical methods can be found in Monitoring – Laboratory analysis, while some of the guidance provided by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority for analysing chemical residues in foodstuffs is also relevant to water quality analyses.

If your proposal is approved, you can start to develop a DGV in line with our publication approval process (refer to Figure 1).

A cost is associated with the review process for each submission.

• Each proposed toxicant DGV submitted for review will be processed based on an assessment of priority and budget availability. Funding the development of a DGV may escalate its priority.
• There is currently a waiting list for reviewing third-party proposed toxicant DGVs (Table 4).

Table 4 List of default guideline values proposed by third parties

Approved reviewers for proposed toxicant default guideline values

Every toxicant DGV needs to be peer reviewed by at least 2 peer reviewers. As a part of the independent peer review process, third-parties will need to engage peer reviewers approved by the Water Quality Guidelines team.